Artificial Intelligence And Patent Law – Analysis – Eurasia Review

Artificial Intelligence And Patent Law – Analysis – Eurasia Review

Artificial Intelligence And Patent Law – Analysis – Eurasia Review

https://www.eurasiareview.com/13012026-artificial-intelligence-and-patent-law-analysis/

Publish Date: 2026-01-12 19:59:00

Source Domain: www.eurasiareview.com

  • Advances in AI raise novel questions for U.S. patent law and other branches of intellectual property law.
  • The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has issued guidance on whether inventions made using AI (AI-assisted inventions) and inventions about AI (new AI technologies) are patentable.
  • Current law requires a human inventor and does not allow patenting of inventions made solely by AI.
  • The Federal Circuit held in Thaler v. Vidal that an inventor must be a natural person, so AI systems cannot be listed as inventors on patents.
  • In 2024, USPTO issued guidance stating that AI-assisted inventions could be patented if a human significantly contributed to the invention. However, this guidance was rescinded in 2025, with revised guidance stating that AI is merely a tool that humans can use, and humans must still conceive inventions.
  • The patentability of new AI technologies themselves hinges on whether they qualify as “abstract ideas” that cannot be patented under current law.
  • USPTO’s 2024 AI Eligibility Guidance aims to clarify patent eligibility for AI inventions, focusing on whether AI inventions claim ineligible concepts or integrate such concepts in a practical application.
  • Stakeholders have mixed views on USPTO’s guidance, with some supporting and others criticizing it.
  • Congress has options to amend the Patent Act or continue monitoring USPTO’s guidance and case law to determine if new legislation is needed.