Lawmakers propose AI framework that would preempt state laws for 3 years

Lawmakers propose AI framework that would preempt state laws for 3 years

Lawmakers propose AI framework that would preempt state laws for 3 years

https://www.nextgov.com/artificial-intelligence/2026/06/lawmakers-propose-ai-framework-would-preempt-state-laws-3-years/413975/

Publish Date: 2026-06-04 17:07:00

Source Domain: www.nextgov.com

  • Draft AI Legislation Unveiled: Representatives Jay Obernolte (R-Calif.) and Lori Trahan (D-Mass.) introduced the draft Great American Artificial Intelligence Act of 2026, aimed at regulating AI while promoting technological innovation and adoption.

  • Four Pillars of AI Advancement: The proposed Act focuses on four main pillars: frontier artificial intelligence model governance, workforce impact analysis, cybersecurity, and research and development.

  • Frontier Artificial Intelligence Model Governance: The draft seeks to codify the Center for AI Standards and Innovation’s role in developing standards, evaluating risks, and overseeing an independent verification regime for AI models.

  • Workforce Impact and Cybersecurity: It calls for assessing AI’s effect on the workforce, incorporating AI literacy into education, and enhancing cybersecurity measures to protect against AI-driven cyberthreats.

  • Research and Development Initiatives: The draft aims to bolster AI research and development through interagency coordination and new testbed programs, along with creating the National AI Research Resource.

  • State Regulation Preemption Proposal: The draft includes a temporary three-year preemption clause for state AI regulations, which has drawn criticism from groups concerned about civil rights.

  • Industry Feedback and Congressional Reactions: While some industry groups view the draft as a step forward in AI leadership, others worry about the preemption of state policies and its impact on innovation.

  • Bipartisan Support Yet Division: The draft has received bipartisan backing but has raised concerns from the House Commission on AI and the Innovation Economy and elicited differing opinions on the preemption of state regulations.