Artificial intelligence can be used for grading law school exams, but should it be?

Here is an unordered list summarizing the key points of the article:

– The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in grading law school exams is being tested, raising the question of whether it should be used.
– Professor Jack Graves from Syracuse University College of Law is an advocate for the use of AI for grading, citing consistency and unbiased scoring as key benefits.
– Graves uses tools like ChatGPT and is considering switching to Claude Cowork to grade students’ assignments.
– A study published in the Journal of Law and Empirical Analysis found that AI models correlate highly with human professors in grading, showing significant consistency and correlation.
– Some law professors, like Daniel Schwarcz from the University of Minnesota Law School, advocate for a phased approach to AI use in grading, suggesting initial human grading followed by AI checks for discrepancies.
– There are debates on disclosure of AI use both by students and professors, with some arguing that moving forward without prohibition or disclosure mandates is necessary.
– AI not only aids in grading but also offers insights into student performance and can potentially administer oral exams.
– The article suggests AI’s integration in legal education could expand to support tasks like reviewing mid-terms, providing feedback, and aiding self-administered practice exams.

Overall, the article considers the potential benefits and ethical considerations of using AI in legal education.