Is it possible to beat artificial intelligence (AI) only 1 in 20 or at most 1 in 10 humans. Even thi..
https://www.mk.co.kr/en/columnists/12056999
Publish Date: 2026-05-25 04:02:00
Source Domain: www.mk.co.kr
Here is a summarized version of the article titled by Editorial Writer Kim In-soo:
- AI vs. Human Intelligence: An experiment conducted by neuroscientist Vivian Ming revealed that AI often outperforms humans in predicting future events, suggesting an ontological crisis for human intelligence.
- Limited Human Performance: According to Ming’s research in the Wall Street Journal, a majority of participants in the experiment performed worse than AI in predicting future events, even when assisted by AI.
- Exceptional Few: Only a small percentage of participants managed to outperform AI, earning the label “cyborg” from Ming. They exhibited intellectual humility and took a critical perspective towards AI, challenging its answers and seeking diverse views.
- Human Cognitive Tendencies: Ming argues that most humans are evolving into “cognitive misers,” preferring to rely on AI to avoid the energy-intensive process of independent thinking.
- Educational Implications: The author highlights concerns that modern education systems are failing to foster critical thinking and comfort with uncertainty, making students dependent on immediate answers rather than engaging with complex, ambiguous situations.
- Hope from Intellectual Humility: Ming highlights that the minority who outperformed AI demonstrated characteristics akin to intellectual humility, implying that cultivating questioning and perspective-taking attitudes could be crucial in outmatching AI.
- Cultural Impact: The broader societal implications of AI dominance are questioned, particularly in how it reshapes human interactions, behaviors, and the way we perceive intelligence and cognitive abilities.
This summary encapsulates the essence of the original article written by Kim In-soo.
