{"id":175881,"date":"2026-01-09T06:36:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-09T11:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/01\/09\/isf-warns-geopolitics-will-be-the-defining-cybersecurity-risk-of-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-01-09T07:20:11","modified_gmt":"2026-01-09T12:20:11","slug":"isf-warns-geopolitics-will-be-the-defining-cybersecurity-risk-of-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/2026\/01\/09\/isf-warns-geopolitics-will-be-the-defining-cybersecurity-risk-of-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"ISF warns geopolitics will be the defining cybersecurity risk of 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

ISF warns geopolitics will be the defining cybersecurity risk of 2026<\/a><\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.tennessean.com\/press-release\/story\/131218\/isf-warns-geopolitics-will-be-the-defining-cybersecurity-risk-of-2026\/<\/a><\/p>\n

Publish Date: 2026-01-09 06:36:00<\/a><\/p>\n

Source Domain: www.tennessean.com<\/a><\/p>\n

Author: <\/a><\/p>\n

Using an unordered list, summarize the following article with between 4 and 8 key points.
\n LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, January 9, 2026 \/EINPresswire.com\/ \u2014 Geopolitics is set to become the dominant cybersecurity risk of 2026, the Information Security Forum warns, as nation states intensify digital espionage and pressure on critical infrastructure \u2014 and even paper back-ups regain importance as a last line of defence when systems fail<\/p>\n

Cybersecurity risk in 2026 will be shaped less by opportunistic criminals than by geopolitics, as nation states increasingly weaponise technology, information and infrastructure, according to the Information Security Forum (ISF).<\/p>\n

Speaking in a new broadcast interview, Steve Durbin, chief executive of the ISF, said the convergence of political tension, digital dependency and state-backed capability is pushing organisations into a far more volatile threat environment.<\/p>\n

\u201cIf 2026 is anything like 2025, we\u2019re going to have a bumpy year,\u201d Durbin said. \u201cSociety has become very dependent on technology and nation states have understood that there is a lot of value in the information that is out there.\u201d<\/p>\n

Durbin warned that espionage has undergone a fundamental transformation. Activity that once required physical presence, risk and human networks can now be conducted remotely, at scale and with far lower cost.<\/p>\n

\u201cEspionage has been around for centuries but today there\u2019s no need for spies to do things the hard way like they did in the past,\u201d he said. \u201cThey can work from home very easily, so espionage has changed completely.\u201d<\/p>\n

That change, he argued, places businesses, public bodies and critical infrastructure directly in the firing line of geopolitical conflict, whether they see themselves as political actors or not.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe have to come back to critical infrastructure,\u201d Durbin said. \u201cIf you\u2019re a key player in that space, you will be under significant attack at some point in time, if not already.\u201d<\/p>\n

The ISF believes governments have become increasingly aware that political leverage can be exercised through digital disruption as well as diplomacy.<\/p>\n

\u201cSome governments have woken up to the fact that politics itself can be weaponised,\u201d Durbin said. \u201cOthers have understood they need to be playing a very strong defensive game, depending on where they happen to be in the world.\u201d<\/p>\n

He stressed that governments rarely operate alone, and that the security of national systems is deeply entwined with the private sector.<\/p>\n

\u201cGovernments rarely work in isolation and work alongside large corporates,\u201d he said. \u201cIt is this public\u2013private partnership that we need to be focusing on in a geopolitical context.\u201d<\/p>\n

Durbin also raised concerns that many of the world\u2019s largest organisations are failing to prepare for the long-term implications of quantum computing, despite the sensitivity of the data they hold.<\/p>\n

Some sectors, he warned, will face particularly severe consequences if encrypted records become vulnerable.<\/p>\n

\u201cOrganisations such as hospitals and NHS trusts that store huge amounts of sensitive, highly confidential health records should be concerned about quantum computing,\u201d he said, adding that preparation timelines could stretch over several years.<\/p>\n

Despite the rapid pace of technological change, Durbin cautioned against abandoning older safeguards altogether. In a geopolitically charged environment, resilience may depend on simplicity as much as innovation.<\/p>\n

He said: \u201cToday, it\u2019s fashionable to go back to old paper-driven approaches. You can\u2019t hack a bit of paper and we just need to store it safely. So although we\u2019re all getting excited about technology, paper can be very useful.\u201d<\/p>\n

On regulation, Durbin reiterated the ISF\u2019s long-held position that compliance alone does not deliver security, while acknowledging that voluntary action may no longer be sufficient.<\/p>\n

\u201cI\u2019m not a big fan of regulation because I would like to think we could get the right balance,\u201d he said. \u201cGood compliance doesn\u2019t mean good security, but good security does, in most cases, mean good compliance.\u201d<\/p>\n

He suggested that cybersecurity assurance is increasingly moving towards the logic of financial governance.<\/p>\n

\u201cI do think we\u2019re getting to a point where companies need to consider their security systems in much the same way as a financial audit,\u201d Durbin said. \u201cSmart boards will be insisting on a security audit by a third party.\u201d<\/p>\n

While he would prefer companies to opt in voluntarily, Durbin acknowledged that regulatory intervention may become unavoidable.<\/p>\n

At board level, the ISF is urging organisations to plan for failure as a matter of governance, rather than optimism.<\/p>\n

\u201cBoards need to plan for the day their defences fail,\u201d Durbin said. \u201cThe starting point is to figure out how long you can be without your systems.\u201d<\/p>\n

He called for annual rehearsals of major cyber incidents and clearer identification of organisational priorities.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s important to know what the crown jewels are in your organisation and know how to protect them,\u201d he said. \u201cUltimately, it\u2019s the board that remains responsible.\u201d<\/p>\n

Looking ahead, Durbin argued that no single organisation or sector can address geopolitically driven cyber risk alone.<\/p>\n

\u201cFrom now on, I think there is a need for us to embrace a cross-industry approach to sharing information,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n

Steve Durbin\u2019s full interview with Business Matters will air on Bloomberg TV on Sunday 11 January at 9:30am (Sky 502, Virgin 609, Freesat 208), and will be available thereafter on The European\u2019s YouTube channel.<\/p>\n

C Nugent-IsittCP Media Globalemail us here<\/p>\n

Legal Disclaimer:<\/p>\n

EIN Presswire provides this news content \u201cas is\u201d without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liabilityfor the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in thisarticle. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.<\/p>\n

Information contained on this page is provided by an independent third-party content provider. XPRMedia and this Site make no warranties or representations in connection therewith. If you are affiliated with this page and would like it removed please contact pressreleases@xpr.media
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ISF warns geopolitics will be the defining cybersecurity risk of 2026 https:\/\/www.tennessean.com\/press-release\/story\/131218\/isf-warns-geopolitics-will-be-the-defining-cybersecurity-risk-of-2026\/ Publish Date: 2026-01-09…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":175882,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/tennessean.xpr-gannett.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/224\/2025\/05\/image-14.webp","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[24],"class_list":["post-175881","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cybersecurity","tag-cybersecurity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175881"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175881"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175881\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":175883,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175881\/revisions\/175883"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/175882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/testing.news-you-need.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}